Small cars fare poorly in latest front-end crash tests
DETROIT — The four-door Mini Cooper Countryman was the only one of 12 cars to earn a top rating of “good” in new frontal crash tests.
NAM Y. HUH ASSOCIATED PRESS The 2014 Mini Cooper Countryman performed best of 12 small-car models in new frontal crash tests.
The Nissan Leaf, Nissan Juke, Fiat 500L and Mazda5 wagon all fared worst in the tests, performed by the Insurance Institute for Highway Safety, an Arlington, Va.-based safety group funded by insurers.
The Chevrolet Volt, Ford C-Max, Mitsubishi Lancer, Scion FR-S and Subaru BRZ all got the“acceptable second-highest rating of acceptable .” The Hyundai Veloster and Scion xB were a notch below that, with “marginal” ratings.
- The small-overlap front-crash test, introduced in 2012, replicates what happens when 25 percent of a car’s front end strikes a rigid object at 40 mph. It’s a difficult test because a small area of the car’s front end must absorb and manage the energy from a severe, high-speed crash.
To earn a “good” rating, a car must keep the cabin around the occupants largely intact and protect them with a combination of seat belts and air bags, the institute said. When a car’s cabin collapses, as it did in the crash tests of the Juke, Leaf, 500L and Mazda5, it can move the seats and air bags out of place, increasing the risk of injuries.
The institute said 19 of the 32 small cars it has now tested have earned “good” or “acceptable” ratings on the small-overlap test. The institute said the Mazda5 was among the worst performers it has tested. Its side air bags didn’t deploy at all and its driver’s-side door unlatched, which shouldn’t happen during a test.
In a statement, Mazda pointed out that the Mazda5 has earned “good” ratings on other tests by the institute, including a front moderate-overlap test and a roof-strength test. It earned a “marginal” rating in a side-impact crash test.