SMOKINCHOICES (and other musings)

February 28, 2013

Medicare for ALL, smart

Medicare isn’t perfect,  but it’s a BETTER DEAL
       Than the “Private Sector”


     Froma Harrop

When folks pan the Affordable Care Act for being nearly 3,000 pages long, here’s a sensible response: It could have been done in a page and a half if it simply declared that Medicare would cover everyone.

The concept of Medicare for All was pushed by a few lonely liberals. And it would have been, ironically, the most conservative approach to bringing down health-care costs while maintaining quality.

Medicare bringing down health-care costs? “Ha, ha, ha,” say the program’s foes, citing the spending projections for the government health plan serving older Americans.

Unfortunately, the critics confuse spending levels with costs. Total Medicare spending is bound to rise as more older Americans live longer.

Sure, you can curb that increase through a voucher system limiting how much taxpayers will subsidize each beneficiary. But that’s not the same as curbing the cost of treating a heart attack or cancer. Without Medicare’s cost controls, the size of the bill for each course of care would be larger. Which is exactly what the medical-industrial complex wants.

  • A Time magazine piece by Steven Brill is must-reading on this subject. For all the waste and perverse incentives in Medicare, the federal program remains an oasis of cost-control in a desert of price-gouging by medical institutions, many parading around as “nonprofits.”

Brill writes of Sean Recchi, a 42-year-old Ohioan with lymphoma. Suffering chills, pains and sweats, he rushed off to the famed MD Anderson Cancer Center in Houston. Anderson wouldn’t accept the Recchis’ bare-bones insurance plan and required $83,900 upfront for an examination and initial doses of chemotherapy. (His mother-in-law wrote the checks.)

  • How did the bill get that high? Shameless overcharging. For example, the hospital charged Recchi $283 to have a simple chest X-ray for which Medicare would have paid $20.44. Recchi was billed more than $15,000 for blood and other lab tests. Medicare would have paid only a few hundred for the same thing.

“Why does simple lab work done during a few days in a hospital cost more than a car?” Brill asks rhetorically.

  • Recchi was charged $13,702 for a round of the cancer drug Rituxan. Researching how much hospitals pay for Rituxan, Brill estimated that Anderson had marked up the price 400 percent. And so on.

Janice S., age 64, felt chest pains and took herself to Stamford Hospital in Connecticut. While there, she was given three troponin tests to measure proteins in the blood. She was charged $199.50 for each troponin test. Had she been a year older and on Medicare, the hospital would have been paid only $13.94 for each test. The heart-attack false alarm ended up costing her $21,000.

Where does all this money end up? In the pockets of hospital administrators, doctors and makers of equipment and drugs on which the medical profession can multiply the markups.

Hospitals gripe that they lose money on Medicare patients, but that isn’t true. As Jonathan Blum, deputy administrator of the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services, told Brill: “Central Florida is overflowing with Medicare patients, and all those hospitals are expanding and advertising for Medicare patients. So you can’t tell me they’re losing money.”

Many Republicans and some Democrats want to cut Medicare spending by raising the eligibility age. That makes minus-zero sense. If anything, the age should be lowered.

This is not to say that Medicare doesn’t waste money. Under current rules, for example, it must cover treatments that work, even when another, cheaper means of care does just as good a job.

  • But the economics of medicine in the private sector bears little resemblance to a real free market. Hospitals routinely put on a magic show designed to bilk ordinary Americans, especially — and tragically — the under-insured.

Froma Harrop writes for Creators Syndicate. fharrop@projo.com

(I seriously want to read Brill’s article in Time magazine.  I along with 1000’s of others (not only Democrats) were  very anxious to have the new “healthcare system” spoken of by our upcoming president to be a single payer system as has been successfully practiced abroad.   I have derided Obama previously for jumping ship when he backed off from that effort.  Perhaps he realized that it would be impossible for Republican cooperation and accepted what he could.  But I’m not over it yet.    You really don’t need much more than simple math to see the beauty in such a plan and of course, the savings.   If enough people could understand this, it would be so easy.  

The crazies in the street aren’t the only ones with a gun in our gut – – the entire medical establishment has been doing this for decades and it grows exponentially.  This issue can’t be solved making nice.  It will take someone with a willingness to fight the good fight.  I couldn’t do it and I believe our president has no taste for discord either.  But to be a politician, if one can’t fight for what is right when something needs to be done, there is no hope at all.  Jan)

Advertisements

Leave a Comment »

No comments yet.

RSS feed for comments on this post.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: