SMOKINCHOICES (and other musings)

April 29, 2010

Nat’l ID, fix immigration?

Filed under: Uncategorized — Jan Turner @ 10:57 am
Tags:

(The ‘immigration crisis’ in Arizona has everyone’s attention, rightly so.  It brings us shame and breaks the ethic we all mostly believe in.  That this is a difficult situation is attested to by how many administrations have genuinely given lip service and some action to it’s solution – - but to no avail.  The problem goes on and on . . . in a way, who could blame Arizona really?  For this is indeed a Federal issue and has gone unsolved far too long.  But what would be the fair, American way?    Check out Froma Harrop’s article here in which she brings us up to date on a distinct possibility.    Left unaddressed is the amnesty issue, but if we all demand every possible issue to be satisfied – - nothing will ever get done.  Sometimes, a well-thought step in the right direction can be a good thing.   You know – this  could work!    Jan)

National ID would help curb illegal immigration

President Barack Obama is right that Arizona’s tough immigration law is “misguided.” And Arizona Gov. Jan Brewer is right that her state has been “more than patient waiting for Washington to act.” The two are not unrelated.

Enforcing our immigration laws is a federal responsibility, which Washington has failed to meet. It’s too bad that the Arizona law comes just as the Obama administration had started doing what must be done — and a plan for effective immigration reform has some Senate support.

After eight years of passivity under the Bush administration, Immigration and Customs Enforcement is actively going after companies found to be employing illegal workers. That and a weak economy are credited with having slowed the surge of illegal immigrants. (Note that Immigration and Customs Enforcement is managed by Homeland Security Secretary Janet Napolitano, a former Arizona governor.)

But as Brewer said, patience is gone. Border states such as Arizona have long served as highways and havens for illegal immigrants. Meanwhile, locals fear with good reason that the drug war in Mexico is unleashing a new wave of entrants and violence. The recent murder of rancher Robert Krentz, presumably by an illegal immigrant, pushed many Arizonans over the edge.

The result is a policy that is disturbingly unfair to Latino populations. The law makes it a crime to move around without immigration documents and lets police demand such papers from anyone suspected of being in the United States illegally.   You know who that means: people from Mexico or who look like they could be from Mexico. And although the governor has promised to train officers against racial profiling, how could there not be? What would make an Arizona law enforcer suspect that someone is here illegally other than that person’s ethnic appearance?

Stopping brown people in the street is not the way to address the problem. The great majority of illegal immigrants come for work. Though they shouldn’t be here, these are mostly good people supporting their families. These poor folk deserve to be treated humanely.

Arizona doesn’t need a new law to capture and deport the criminal element. As in many other states, police already check the immigration status of anyone charged with a crime. Those here illegally are referred to Immigration and Customs Enforcement.

Harassing countless innocents alongside illegal immigrants is a callous and futile way to stop massive flows of undocumented workers. The more successful approach is to remove the job magnet by fining and possibly jailing their employers.

It is already against the law to hire illegal aliens, but the giant loophole is the lack of a counterfeit-proof form of identification. If the job-seeker presents a reasonably good-looking document, a company can’t be held liable if that person is found to be working illegally.

An immigration reform proposal put together by Sens. Charles Schumer, D-N.Y., and Lindsay Graham, R-S.C., would end that dodge by creating a Social Security card that contains fingerprints, eye scans or other biometric markers unique to each individual. Employers would check the information against a national database for all new hires, be they immigrant or native born.

No, Arizona is not going about this the right way. But its radical law may spur overdue action. Now is the best time for it, when a slow economy has deflated the cheap-labor argument that only illegal immigrants will wash dishes or mop floors.

Effective immigration controls are not impossible. Canada has a large immigration program and virtually no illegal workers. Until the federal government creates a rational system, states are going to pass laws out of anger and panic. It’s time for Washington to do its duty.
Froma Harrop writes for Creators Syndicate.
fharrop@projo.com

FROMA HARROP

Mines exploit loopholes

Filed under: Uncategorized — Jan Turner @ 12:48 am
Tags: ,

Critic: Mines exploit loopholes

Disaster site cited hundreds of times, Senate panel told

By David Zucchino and Kim Geiger
LOS ANGELES TIMES

WASHINGTON — The company that operated the West Virginia coal mine where an explosion killed 29 miners this month was able to “game the system” by using a lengthy appeals process to avoid safety shutdowns, witnesses told a Senate committee yesterday.
.
Massey Energy Co. was cited 515 times for safety violations at the Upper Big Branch mine last year and  124 times this year before the April 5 explosion. Many violations were for improper ventilation of methane and coal dust, the suspected causes of the worst U.S. mine disaster in 40 years.
Because of loopholes in safety laws and a backlog of 16,000 safety-violation appeals, federal inspectors are unable to shut down unsafe mine sections for more than short periods. The average appeals process drags on for 600 days.
.
“You just about have to have an explosion” to force a closure for safety violations, Joe Main, leader of the federal Mine Safety and Health Administration, told the Senate Committee on Health, Education, Labor and Pensions.
.
The hearing was attended by family members of miners killed in other mine disasters. They heard a mine workers’ union leader angrily accuse Massey of knowingly operating unsafe mines.   “The miners who work for Massey are scared to death,” said Cecil Roberts, president of the United Mine Workers. “They’re intimidated. This company is run like it’s 1921, not like it’s the present day.”
.
No Massey officials attended the hearing. A representative of the National Mining Association, an industry group, told the committee that current federal regulations are adequate to ensure mine safety.
“The tools are sufficient when properly used,” said Bruce Watzman, the association’s senior vice president.
.
Massey was hit with $1.24 million in penalties for safety violations at the Upper Big Branch Mine between January 2009 and the April 5 disaster. But it paid only $180,000 because fines are not due until appeals are exhausted. Some fines imposed in 2006 still have not been paid; Massey contested 78 percent of assessed penalties in its mines in 2009.
.
Last year, federal inspectors issued 48 withdrawal orders requiring miners to evacuate dangerous sections at Upper Big Branch, but Massey was able to stall a shutdown of the mine.

“It’s very easy to game the system,” Main said, describing mine operators’ “catch me if you can” mentality.

Theme: Rubric. Blog at WordPress.com.

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.